Written and reviewed for scientific and factual accuracy by Dr. Austin Jelcick, PhD and Dr. Matthew Janzen, DC
There are a lot of mixed opinions out there about whether or not braces are valuable in the treatment of scoliosis. Some conservative treatment methods still tout in their advertising that “No Braces” are necessary, or that bracing is outdated or even harmful. Many orthopedic surgeons seem to have little confidence in the ability of a brace to help, and may recommend them with a “fingers-crossed” attitude of “maybe we’ll get lucky”. Yet some specialists insist that scoliosis patients should be wearing a brace 23 hours a day. Who is right? How can you determine who is giving you the best advice?
What would be really useful for answering this question is a mega-study to compare the results of patients who DO wear a brace against those scoliosis patients who do NOT wear a brace. This is exactly what the publishers of the “BRAIST” study (Bracing in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Trial) set out to do- and did1. The results of this study may startle you.
The very first sentence of the BRAIST study declares, “The role of bracing in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis who are at risk for curve progression and eventual surgery is controversial”. This is why the study was done. To target those “at risk for curve progression” the study specifically focused on growing adolescents aged 10-15 years old with curves between 20 to 40 degrees. Such a group is known to be at extremely high risk for progressing beyond 50 degrees. A “successful” outcome was defined as this: The curve staying below 50 degrees in size when the child was finished growing. A failed outcome was defined as: “Any child that progressed beyond the 50-degree mark. This threshold was chosen because curve progression as an adult is highly probable when the Cobb angle has grown this severe in adolescence. This is the point at which most surgeons recommend surgery.
By splitting these children into two groups – those who received a brace and those who did not, the study was able to confidently measure the difference in success between wearing a brace and not wearing one. It is important also to note, that only rigid braces were allowed in this study. Soft braces did not qualify. The shocking result of the study is this: Wearing a brace had a success rate so much greater than not wearing a brace, that the ethics review board deemed it unethical to continue the study. The study had to be stopped far before the intended time because the results were so overwhelmingly obvious: To refuse a rigid brace to the non-braced children in the study was harming the children and making it unethical to treat high-risk scoliosis cases without a brace!
Two solid conclusions came out of the BRAIST study, and one shocking number:
- Rigid bracing significantly reduces worsening of curves in the 20-40 degree range (High-risk curves as defined above)
- The more you wear the brace, the better it works! Go figure – kids that actually wore their brace the most had the best results.
So what is the shocking number? Fifty-eight percent of the no-brace “observation only” group progressed to surgical-need, worsening beyond the 50-degree mark at which surgery is considered “needed”. Fifty-eight percent is huge – that’s over half the kids in the 20-40 degree range, still growing, ended up needing surgery! The number had previously been reported as low as 22%2, the BRAIST authors had predicted as high as 30%, but no one even realized the failure rate of “watch and wait – observation only” was as high as 58%! This is a massive failure in the current care standard of “Observation – wait and see” for managing scoliosis!
No one was predicting that there was such a shockingly high
58% FAILURE RATE
In the “Watch and Wait” Observation only group!
This is far worse than anyone realized
It has been nearly 5 years since the publication of the BRAIST study, yet sadly non-surgical clinics and methods are still telling parents that wearing a rigid brace is harmful, outdated, and/or does not work. It would seem as though they either did not get the BRAIST memo or perhaps they just refuse to see the evidence. Whatever the reason, the confusion that anti-brace messages bring to the public is indeed harming children with scoliosis. Don’t let your child be a casualty of misinformation. Read up on the BRAIST study, and you will find the jury is in- rigid braces work, and remarkably so, especially when actually worn by the patients.
One would think that such solid findings in favor of rigid bracing would send shockwaves throughout the orthopedic world and throughout the non-surgical camps that treat scoliosis. The controversy is dead… right? What is left to debate? Shouldn’t everyone be recommending rigid braces? Shouldn’t all doctors now agree that this is clearly the best course of action?
If you would like to know how you can receive the most benefit possible from a brace for your child, we invite you to inquire regarding our Silicon Valley MethodTM and how it is possible to receive surgical-like straightening of the spine, without the surgery.
A final note about the BRAIST study: While we know that wearing the brace more than 18 hours a day yields a better result, the study failed to provide data on the quality of the brace itself; meaning the study did not track how straight the brace made each spine. Logically the straighter the brace can hold the spine, the better the chances of spine growing straighter. There is emerging research which suggests that focusing on developing braces which provide better in-brace correction will yield better clinical outcomes (straighter spines).3–6
- Weinstein SL, Dolan LA, Wright JG, Dobbs MB. Effects of bracing in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis. N Engl J Med 2013;369:1512–21.
- Dolan LA, Weinstein SL. Surgical rates after observation and bracing for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: an evidence-based review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2007;32:S91-S100.
- Negrini S, Marchini G, Tessadri F. Brace technology thematic series – The Sforzesco and Sibilla braces, and the SPoRT (Symmetric, Patient-oriented, Rigid, Three-dimensional, active) concept. Scoliosis 2011;6:8.
- Aulisa AG, Mastantuoni G, Laineri M, et al. Brace technology thematic series: the progressive action short brace (PASB). Scoliosis 2012;7:6.
- Mauroy JC de, Pourret S, Barral. Immediate in-brace correction with the new Lyon brace (ARTbrace), Results of 141 consecutive patients in accordance with SRS criteria for bracing studies. Ann Phys Rehabil Med 2016;59:e32.
- Minsk MK, Venuti KD, Daumit GL, Sponseller PD. Effectiveness of the Rigo Cheneau versus Boston-style orthoses for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a retrospective study. Scoliosis Spinal Disord 2017;12:7.